Section 1: Summary: In the first section of your paper, explain the Stoic “dichotomy of control”. Give an example of something we can
SHORT PAPER #4
Assignment directions:
Your paper should have two sections.
Section 1: Summary: In the first section of your paper, explain the Stoic “dichotomy of control”. Give an example of something we can control. Give an example of something we cannot control. Second, explain how the Stoic view of the will is similar to Kant’s.
Section 2: Evaluation: In the second section, tell me whether you think the dichotomy of control is a useful approach to the world. Why or why not?
DO NOT FORGET: ONCE YOU SUBMIT YOUR ESSAY, YOU NEED TO OBJECT TO ONE OTHER STUDENT’S ESSAY.
Formatting, length, style, and other guidelines:
Your reply to a classmate is worth 5 of the 20 points. Make sure your reply is substantive and critical (provides an objection to their evaluation and gives reasons why the objection is correct). This means that you need to say more than “good job, but I disagree”. If you find yourself making a comment that could easily be copy/pasted into every reply of the semester (because it is not specific), then you need to know that comment will not receive any points. Furthermore, make sure you are objecting to the view that your classmate expresses in his/her evaluation section, even if you agree with that person. Think of yourself as a devil’s advocate. So, if, in the evaluation section, your classmate says: “X is the case”, your reply should be “Someone might say that X is not the case, and here’s a reason why…” If you fail to provide an objection, you will lose 5 points.
Your paper should be 300-600 words (about 1-2 pages). This is a target/suggestion, not a hard-and-fast rule.
Your paper should have two sections. Label them “Section 1: Summary” and “Section 2: Evaluation”.
The title of your paper should be “Short Paper 4: Stoics”.
Think through this on your own. Avoid using outside sources, but if you do use them, cite them!
As for the level of discussion: a good rule of thumb is to imagine that you are explaining this argument to a smart peer in the class who is otherwise up-to-date on the course readings, but has not read the chapter.
Clarity: Use simple, direct language; avoid complicated, elaborate prose. Explain key concepts. Use examples where appropriate. Avoid metaphor and figurative language. Don’t use rhetorical questions; instead, state and defend your claims.
Concision: Don’t use many words where fewer will do, and avoid redundancy. Do NOT include an introduction; it’s a waste of space in a paper this short. Just immediately begin answering the assigned prompts. Likewise, there is no need for a conclusion that merely sums up your short paper.
Relevance: Stay focused, and avoid generalities. The point of this essay is for you to explain and evaluate a specific argument given by a philosopher. Stick to the point; avoid tangents; everything in your paper should be organized around the prompts.
Charity: Avoid distortive presentations of the arguments (or anyone else’s). Give every argument you discuss the strongest, reasonable interpretation.
Citations: Every paper you write should include parenthetical citations! Failure to cite results in a significant penalty. See “MUST READ: Discussion Board Rules” for examples of how to cite.
Deadline and how to submit:
The paper can be written in a separate word processor, then copy/pasted into the ‘reply’ text box. Or, less ideally, you can type it directly into the text box. DO NOT SUBMIT FILES!
Search entries or author
Search entries or author
Filter replies by unread
ReplyReply to Discussion Board 4: Stoics
Replies are only visible to those who have posted at least one reply.
Answer preview for Section 1: Summary: In the first section of your paper, explain the Stoic “dichotomy of control”. Give an example of something we can
MLA
319 Words