Wikipedia is a powerful tool for gaining a quick understanding of new subject matter. Most articles have an outline that can help you pinpoint areas
Wikipedia is a powerful tool for gaining a quick understanding of new subject matter. Most articles have an outline that can help you pinpoint areas of further study as well as holding potentially useful links to accurate sources. However, Wikipedia has limits for deeper research because it is erratic.
For an exercise, Google “Chile coup,” as you may have done for last Thursday’s homework. The first entry listed is the Wikipedia link below:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
Let’s hypothesize that you had heard the US was somehow involved with the coup and wanted to learn if it was true. Read the first two paragraphs. Notice the last sentence on paragraph two. It states that the Nixon Administration “worked to create the conditions for the coup.” Hover your curser over the footnotes listed there: [9][10][11]. These are the sources used to support the statement. Make note of the authors of each source; write them down if you can’t remember them.
Next, Google “Chile dictatorship.” The first entry listed is again, a Wikipedia link:
1-Read the first paragraph of the article. What is the last line in essence informing the reader?
2-Do you recognize any of the authors from the first article? What does this suggest about the Wikipedia’s content and sourcing?
3-Open the footnoted source article, [1], using ELAC’s library if needed. You don’t have to read the arguments in the article, but try to explain what the purpose of the writing is. Who are the two authors? What’s taking place here? What does this tell us about Wikipedia?
1-2 pages
Solution preview for the order on Wikipedia is a powerful tool for gaining a quick understanding of new subject matter. Most articles have an outline that can help you pinpoint areas
APA
417 words