Compare and contrast the authors’ arguments in the week’s readings
Weekly Reaction Paper, 2 pages
Attached are the four readings(they’re short)
Each reaction papers should:
1.) Demonstrate that you have completed and understood the main themes of the week’s readings by summarizing the most significant ideas.
2.) Connect the readings’ themes to broader course themes, lectures, and other readings.
3.) Present your reaction to the readings, informed by course materials and your own experiences.
You have freedom in how you approach reaction papers, but here are a few suggestions:
Compare and contrast the authors’ arguments in the week’s readings, or compare and contrast them with previous weeks’ readings.
Draw connections between the reading and your own experience or the experience of people you know.
Discuss how you agree or disagree with the author’s point of view and why.
Explain the strengths and weaknesses of the author’s argument.
Describe why you find the author’s argument interesting, compelling, problematic, etc.
Explain how the reading fits into our past or current discussions of urban society.
Solution previewExclusion is a phenomenon that covers the social and spatial aspects of life. Ali Madanipour interestingly looks at social exclusion in three dimensions in ways that explain our lives in society as they affect us in actual sense……………………….